All Posts Tagged With: "Obama"
Political Events presents – Did Obama’s First 100 Days Meet Your Expectations?
Here on Political Events we are happy to provide you with articles from a wide variety of guest authors with a diverse range of political thought.
Did Obama’s First 100 Days Meet Your Expectations?
By Joe DelCasino
It will be interesting to see how the media spins the president’s first 100 days in office, but will come as no surprise if Democrats are deemed to be more satisfied than Republicans with the “results” so far. Don’t be surprised if some Democrats are also deemed to be more disappointed than Republicans.
President Obama is presiding over the most emphatically liberal Democratic agenda in our nation’s modern history. He has taken steps to dramatically grow government and is proposing to spend money like it’s going out of style. He justifies his radical moves by claiming it’s the only way to undo the economic peril left by the previous administration. He has used that assessment to effectively exclude Republicans from important budgetary and other legislative matters so far. Democrats should be delighted, but are they getting what they bargained for from team Obama?
Most Democrats believed Obama was going to change the corrupt and special interests that have heretofore characterized national politics. They also expected him to rise above partisan politics for the greater good and involve people of integrity in his new and transparent administration. Instead, the president’s first 100 days has shown his willingness to set unilaterally (with his democratic and liberal congress) long term, financially irreversible and profound strategic directions for our nation. Transparency seems to have vanished as a general objective but has been used as a weapon for political expedience to embarrass his opposition, such as to punish the Bush administration for war crimes. His cabinet nominations have been drawn from the same pool of tainted politicians that his administration was supposed to eliminate. So much for cleaning up old-style Washington politics.
Furthermore, the fiscally-conservative Democrats and Independents that bought into the moderate, centrist persona that Obama conjured up to win the election are still recovering from the whiplash of him darting to the left soon after his inauguration.
Most Republicans saw that head fake coming and probably feel they got what they expected from an Obama presidency, even if they’re now horrified with how the nation is being managed. The good news for them is that so far Obama continues to be a talker and not a doer, and given his penchant for popularity he may change directions if the political tea leaves so dictate.
Obama’s inaction may also be bad news for the nation. If Obama doesn’t take definitive action soon to put us on a path to economic prosperity, our American goose may be cooked. We’ve gotten plenty of lip service about change, but only after the details are worked out and actually implemented will we know if it’s change for its own sake or change we can believe in.
More articles by this author are available at http://joedelcasino.blogspot.com Books are available at http://www.Xlibris.com
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joe_DelCasino
http://EzineArticles.com/?Did-Obamas-First-100-Days-Meet-Your-Expectations?&id=2279407
Political Events presents – The Testing of a President
Here on Political Events we are happy to provide you with articles from a wide variety of guest authors with a diverse range of political thought.
The Testing of a President
By Gene Lalor
Macbeth: “Is this a dagger which I see before me…” Macbeth (II, i, 33)
I doubt President Obama sees any daggers, real or imagined, but he hopefully sees tests before him, tests which could serve the same purpose as daggers at America’s throat.
Vice President Biden, before he was VP Biden, had warned that tests would happen. Back in October, the prescient Joe said, “We’re about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember, I said it standing here, if you don’t remember anything else I said: Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”
Pal Joey apparently was muzzled, squelched, told to shut up shortly thereafter and never again spoke publically of testing “the mettle [the character] of this guy,” the President- Presumptive at the time, Senator Barack Hussein Obama.
Well, that test or tests, international and domestic, in political-speak, have now been “generated,” in real-speak they have “hit the fan,” and we shall shortly see the depth of Obama’s brilliance and character.
The domestic testing has been ongoing and is a carryover from the administration of Bush II. Mainly, but not exclusively, it has consisted of the banking, mortgage, economic mess. Only time will tell whether history assigns Obama, and therefore America, a passing grade.
At this point, Wall Street has evidently decided to give a resounding “F” to the new president and for his wonder boy, tax-cheating Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner. Their mindless profligacy in tossing around a trillion here, a trillion there, of taxpayer dollars have been met with a clear vote of no confidence and a drop of thousands of points on the Dow.
After being clued in by Bill Clinton, Obama suspended his very peculiar gloom and doom, crisis here, crisis there, approach to inspiring Americans in favor of the pep-talky, “Hey, we can do it, folks!” But the damage had already been done.
Main Streeters and Wall Streeters seem to be thinking, Will the real president please stand up and do something constructive? Both should be cautioned not to expect much in that regard since Obama has admitted that he regards the stock market as nothing more than a “tracking poll” and neither he nor Michelle Obama own any stocks, according to their tax returns. So, who cares?
Obama’s other testing fields are overseas, in foreign nations and in international waters and so far he seems to have adopted a very diplomatic, hands-off, do nothing, wait and see approach.
North Korea’s Kim Jong-il, maniacal loose-cannon extraordinaire, thrives on war and rumors of war and gets his jollies by launching missiles and threats, recently including threats to shoot down civilian airliners near his airspace and warning of all-out war if we dare to shoot down his satellite.
The latest news out of Pyongyang is that the paranoid Kim Jong-il has cut his military hotline with South Korea and is in process of mobilizing his million man army. The reason? Fear of invasion by the United States and South Korea.
It’s as realistic to expect a U.S. invasion of North Korea as it is to expect us to invade Angolia but realism never enters the equation when it comes to Kim’s thinking.
Iran’s equally unstable nutcase, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad makes similar threats, threatens missile and nuclear strikes-when Iran’s nuke facilities are up and running-and now demands the United States apologize for 60 years of wrongs against Iran: http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/a/mahmoud_ahmadinejad/index.html
Mahmoud’s very selective memory must have “dis-remembered” when his Ayatollah Khomeini ordered the illegal storming and seizure of our Tehran embassy in 1979. I have to assume that he does not consider imprisoning 52 Americans for 444 days as something worthy of an Iranian apology.
There is, however, another explanation, namely that Mahmoud clearly recalls President Jimmy Carter’s feckless response to that grave offense and he seriously does expect an apology from President Obama.
He may get it if Obama fails this test.
Iran and North Korea are comparative pipsqueaks on the world stage and their incessant testing could be ended within weeks, or days, if Obama summons the nerve to advise both nations that, starting with their leaders, they will be reduced to molten puddles should they dare any funny business.
Fat chance, but hope springs eternal.
More ominous tests, one clearly and intentionally “generated” by a wannabe superpower, the other the result of an inept government allowing drug criminals to go berserk on their own soil, are on Obama’s horizon.
The inept government is that of Mexico’s Felipe Calderon and his ineptitude is a test for Obama mainly because of Mexico’s 2000 mile border with the United States and the four states immediately adjacent to Mexico. Exacerbating the danger is the fact that Mexico’s criminal element now is overflowing into those states, and further north. Houston is already feeling the effects of the infestation of Mexican drug cartels in town; there are at least five such cartels operating in Houston and the gangsters who run them are wreaking havoc.
Mexico, of course, is a tough test for Obama because of its proximity and because of long-term plans for the eventual establishment of a North American Union with Canada and Mexico.
That NAU has been in the works since the Bush I years and involves a virtual surrender of U.S. sovereignty and an “amero” to replace the dollar as our legal currency. Our leaders, of both parties, have already been implementing facets of the NAU. Absurd? The NAU is anything but absurd and Obama’s challenge right now is to repulse this most blatant invasion from Mexico without offending our NAU partner.
Last but hardly least of Obama’s tests and challenges is the People’s Republic of China. Having secured international recognition and esteem with its highly-scripted, manipulated, but very successful summer Olympic Games in 2008, China has no further need to act civilized with the Tibetans or the Taiwanese, or with the United States.
Prefatory to repressing the followers of the Dalai Lama in Tibet and attacking Taiwan, a little evaluation of Obama’s mettle was in order and China began that evalauation on the seas off its coast.
Five Chinese ships surrounded, “shadowed and aggressively maneuvered in dangerously close proximity” to the USNS Impeccable, an unarmed ocean surveillance vessel, on Sunday, March 8, with one ship coming within 25 feet, a U.S. Defense Department statement said:
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSPEK9458120090310?sp=true
Unprovoked, in a scene reminiscent of but far less bloody than Israel’s 1947 attack on the USS Liberty, the Chinese contended the Impeccable was conducting “illegal surveillance,” even though the American ship (like the Liberty) was in international waters and operating within the bounds of all laws governing military vessels on the high seas.
All reports suggest there will be no lasting effects on Chinese-American relations as a result of this maritime confrontation, which is probably true. However, the inscrutable Chinese had succeeded in one mission: They had successfully tested President Obama. His and America’s response? A stern reprimand, which China threw back in our faces, which rendered the reprimand a waste of effort on our part.
More testing is sure to come, especially since China now knows it has a weak and ineffectual American president more committed to words than to actions to deal with.
Meanwhile, waiting patiently in the wings, are Russia, Vladimir Putin, and the puppet Dmitry Medvedev, waiting patiently to see how well Obama fares with the easy tests before he and we are hit with the real toughies.
Gene Lalor is the author of An Immodest Proposal for Ending and Winning the War on Terror, available at Amazon.com
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gene_Lalor
http://EzineArticles.com/?The-Testing-of-a-President&id=2083670
Political Events presents – The More Things Change
Here on Political Events we are happy to provide you with articles from a wide variety of guest authors with a diverse range of political thought.
The More Things Change
By Laura Bramble
They say that history repeats itself. This has certainly been the case in Washington the last two weeks. Senior members of the house are carrying around history books, trying to decide who to emulate. Reid is currently fond of FDR, McConnell and Cantor of Winston Churchill and Newt Gingrich. Each are looking for clues on how to best spin the stimulus bill fight and its potential political aftermath. Both Republicans and Democrats are pinning the future hopes of their parties on this legislation, with both knowing the outcome of the 2010 mid-term elections is riding on its success.
The House Democrats are using their majority control to set the agenda on a definitive liberal slant, hoping to pass programs and initiatives that were gridlocked during the Bush years. Significant health care reform, environmental protection, alternative fuel source development, and greater regulatory control of business and industry are all on the agenda. The stimulus bill was a way to get some immediate action on these issues by tacking them onto a much needed jump start. But will increasing the deficit to fund these programs provide the impetus the economy needs, or is the money being spent in areas that will be of no help to ending the recession?
The Republicans are still holding firm to the doctrine of trickle down economics through corporate and individual tax cuts and breaks, believing that money given to the upper strata and corporations will boost spending, and therefore production, which will reduce unemployment and kick start a flagging economy. However, history has not shown trickle down economics to be successful; corporations have tended to want to keep its wealth for itself and many people are saving their money instead of spending it and promoting business growth.
Only time will tell who is right, but the way this whole situation has played out goes to show one thing. No matter how strong the mandate for change is, old habits die hard. Bipartisanship, like world peace and a delicious non-fat cheesecake, is an idyllic vision we can dream of and hope for. It seems to be just as realistic too.
Laura Bramble
http://www.politicalsimpleton.com/RED_MENACE/THE_MORE_THINGS_CHANGE.html
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Laura_Bramble
http://EzineArticles.com/?The-More-Things-Change&id=2034482